A young girl has dragged the Governor of Ekiti state, Ayodele Fayose, to court with a list of demands she has made.
A pupil of Divine Academy in Ekiti State, Amidat Akingbolu, in a
fresh suit filed before an Ekiti State High Court, is seeking a
determination of the Court on whether the Ekiti State government is
under legal obligation to provide free, compulsory and universal basic
education for every child of primary and junior secondary age under the
unambiguous provisions of the Free Universal Basic Education and Child
Rights Law of Ekiti State.
According to Sahara Reporters, the case has yet to be assigned by the Chief Judge.
The Ekiti State government had provided free primary school
education since 1955 when the policy was introduced by the Obafemi
Awolowo-led administration. But Governor Ayo Fayose has abolished free
education in the State by imposing a fee of N1,000 and N500 for pupils
of private schools and public schools, respectively. Ms. Akingbolu is
challenging that decision of the government.
According to the pupil and her counsel, Kabir Akingbolu, this
policy contravenes section 2(1) of the Free Universal Basic Education
Act of 2004, and Section 15 of the Child Rights Law of Ekiti State. The
Catholic diocese of Ekiti State has also approached the court to cancel
the policy.
Mr. Fayose is being accused of enforcing policies that run contrary
to the provision of the law. The governor is accused of failing to pay
counterpart funding, under the Compulsory Universal Basic Education Act
of 2004, to access federal government support to free primary and junior
secondary education in the State.
He has also been accused of wasting hundreds of millions of naira
in State funds on sponsoring political newspaper adverts, radio and
television jingles, and renting private jets for political rallies.
The plaintiff, in her affidavit of support, further claims the
inability of herself and her siblings, like any other indigent students
of the State, to attend schools since the introduction of the obnoxious
fee due to the financial burden it imposed on their parents.
Considering the ongoing sealing of private schools not in
compliance with the policy, the plaintiff is demanding a perpetual
injunction restraining the governor from locking or sealing off any
private school for the purpose of collecting fees from students and from
further collecting money under any guise from any child of primary and
junior secondary school age in any of the schools in the State.
No comments:
Post a Comment